Showing posts with label sensors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sensors. Show all posts

Friday, August 29, 2025

Opening of the UT Field Lab (formerly Living Innovation Lab) in October 2025

After years of preparation, the UT Field Lab will open in about a month!

"On Thursday afternoon, 2 October, we’re officially opening the brand-new UT FieldLab on campus for all UT staff and those directly involved in the UT FieldLab such as faculty management and sponsors. In the past years we have worked together to develop this unique outdoor facility where research, education, and societal impact come together. As experiment lead you are naturally invited for the opening. The programme for the day is as follows: 

  • Starting from 14:00, everybody is welcome to join a guided tour (drop-in, every 10 minutes).
  • Around 15:30, we’ll gather for the official programme.
  • At 16:00, the central part begins with short talks from key contributors and stakeholders, followed by the official opening by Tom Veldkamp (around 16:45).
  • Afterwards: drinks!

📍 Location: Northeastern side of the campus, near the BMC building


Mark van der Meijde, Léon olde Scholtenhuis and Wim Timmermans, coordinators of the UT FieldLab initiative, are taking care of the guided tour. Passing by each experiment, we think each experiment should be represented by an experiment-expert who can provide more in-depth information when needed."

For green infrastructure, I will be bringing some of the sensors, small pieces of layers of a green roof that you can touch, and some visualizations of what the building could look like when the work is finished. Yes, it is still a work in progress, but I expect it to be visitable next year on the roof itself. For now, please join us and learn more about all the experiments happening at the Field Lab.

Friday, August 22, 2025

Student research results - more thermal walks

One of our master students civil engineering student, Gianluca Belardo, has now finished his MSc thesis, expanding on the results from thermal walks. He also developed site specific recommendations for each of the locations tested and check their feasibility with the municipality Hengelo. The title is 'Urban Heat Stress Assessment in Hengelo Through Thermal Walks to Guide the Implementation of Green-Blue Infrastructure for Urban Cooling'. The summary is below, and the repository link to download the full thesis is here. An overview of the tested locations is in the image. 

"Since the 1940s, global temperatures have steadily increased as a result of climate change. At the same time, rapid urbanisation has driven cities to expand, replacing natural landscapes with built-up areas dominated by materials like concrete and asphalt. These surfaces absorb and retain heat, while the loss of vegetation reduces the natural cooling capacity of the environment. As urban areas grow denser and greener spaces become more limited, cities begin to experience significantly higher temperatures than their rural surroundings, a phenomenon known as the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect. This rise in urban temperatures not only worsens environmental conditions but also poses growing risks to public health and overall quality of life.
This thesis explores how urban design interventions, specifically Green-Blue Infrastructure (GBI), can improve outdoor thermal comfort in city centres. The research focuses on Hengelo, a medium-sized city in the Netherlands that, like many European cities, is increasingly dealing with the consequences of extreme heat, yet lacks detailed microclimate data or clear strategies for site-specific interventions. While Hengelo has made some progress in implementing GBI, many public spaces remain exposed to heat stress, and decision-makers face challenges in balancing spatial constraints, public use, and climate adaptation goals.
To address these challenges, the thesis first evaluates the existing conditions in Hengelo’s urban centre and then proposes targeted GBI strategies to improve thermal comfort in its most heat-stressed areas. This begins with a comprehensive literature review, examining the UHI effect, thermal comfort theory, and the effectiveness of various GBI types in mitigating urban heat in different spatial contexts. The review also explores participatory and observational methods for assessing heat perception, laying the foundation for the fieldwork approach adopted in this thesis.
Building on insights from the literature, the methodology integrates multiple research approaches that shaped both the data collection and the analysis of findings. A spatial analysis was first conducted using the available urban heat maps for Hengelo, helping to identify priority areas that might benefit most from interventions. Due to the low spatial resolution of these maps, assumptions had to be made about which areas were most heat-stressed, based on available information on urban form, surface materials, and existing vegetation. To build on this preliminary assessment, the core of the field research involved thermal walks, a novel method in which participants walked through five different locations while environmental data was recorded and subjective thermal perceptions were gathered. Environmental conditions were measured using two Kestrel 5400 trackers. At each location, one tracker was placed at a reference point and the other at an intervention point to assess the cooling performance of the existing GBI. At the same time, participants at the intervention point completed a questionnaire covering comfort ratings, thermal sensation, and preferences for shade, wind, and cooling.
The results showed a strong correlation between dense green infrastructure and improved thermal comfort. The location with the most dense tree cover recorded a reduction in Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) of over 20°C between reference and intervention points and was consistently rated as the most comfortable by participants. Locations with partial vegetation, also showed moderate cooling effects and improved participant comfort. In contrast, blue infrastructure without shade, such as the pond and the fountain locations, produced limited physical relief. Tracker data even showed PET increases in some cases due to radiant heat from surrounding paving or water reflections, despite participants perceiving these areas as slightly cooler, likely due to the psychological effects of water.
After this analysis, a strategy was developed to improve the less effective locations analysed in the thermal walks and also for the most heat stressed areas that were analysed at an earlier stage. The study then included feedback from municipal representatives, who helped assess the feasibility of the proposed interventions. While some locations, such as the pond area, were deemed realistic for near-term implementation (adding climbing vegetation), all others locations posed challenges due to underground infrastructure and competing land uses. Additionally, the municipality emphasized the importance of maintaining visual openness and ecological balance, where new trees could disrupt existing plant life. As a result, the recommendations reflect not only environmental performance but also practical limitations. The discussion with the municipal representatives also sparked internal reflection within the municipality about whether long-term heat resilience should take precedence over occasional public uses in certain urban spaces.
Based on the findings, this thesis recommends a site-specific approach to urban cooling. Priority should be given to increasing shade through tree planting where feasible, combining green and blue infrastructure in areas with enough space, and using artificial shading (e.g. pergolas or vertical greenery) in more constrained locations. Overall, the research shows that evidence-based interventions, informed by local context, can support effective climate adaptation. Moreover the methodology applied here, specifically the use of thermal walks, builds on existing research and demonstrates their value in connecting environmental data with user experience. In doing so, this study contributes new, location-specific insights and helps further develop the practical application of thermal walks in urban heat research." 

Friday, June 27, 2025

LILa construction April- June 2025

Everything is coming together, and the lab is set to open officially in October under the new name of UT Field Lab. We are also working with the Climate Center to expand long term research goals outside and inside of the former BMC building, going beyond testing the performance of green infrastructure and actively involving stakeholders on the larger societal impacts of climate change. This site can lead to more chances for interactive design of solutions for climate change adaptation. But for now, the planned research is being finished, and plant life is growing abundantly.

Initially in April there is not a lot of visual change from March.

 

 

 In May we can see plant growth as well as the foundations of the green house being laid. 

 

 

 

This continues to progess smoothly towards the end of May.

 

 

 

In June we see the construction of multiple research projects heading into the sky, including finally the tallest research tower that will have a weather station. 

 

 


























 

 

Thursday, June 26, 2025

Student research results - thermal walks Hengelo

Last May two thermal walks were conducted with participants in Hengelo to test five different locations where the municipality has implemented blue/green infrastructure. While some findings were in line with expectations, large trees with more shadow providing a more comfortable environment than small trees, the results on water fountains were more difficult to interpret. 

The summarized results: "dense-canopy trees were the most effective intervention, lowering Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) by up to 5.3 °C and having the highest comfort ratings. Sparse-canopy trees also provided substantial cooling (up to 4.1 °C decrease in WBGT) and are more feasible to plant with their lower spatial requirements and easier to implement in narrower streets of Hengelo’s city centre. The green square presented moderate cooling and mostly positive thermal comfort ratings, although, its use is spatially and financially constrained. Water features were less effective, since the sensors at the water pond recorded consistent warming effects despite positive feedback from the participants, while the water fountain recorded measurable cooling, but had low perceived comfort, as it lacked shade and surrounding vegetation."  

You can read more details in the thesis by Katarzyna MartaOłdak, titled 'Evaluation of the Local Cooling Effect of Existing Green-Blue Infrastructure in Hengelo Through Thermal Walks', at the UTwente repository

Friday, May 16, 2025

What are thermal walks?

As developed at the University of Applied Sciences Amsterdam, "A thermal walk is a research method that is used to map out the heat measured and perceived in a particular area, and to obtain answers to questions such as: how heat-proof is a particular walking route in the city, a shopping street, a residential area, the area around a train station, or a market square? A thermal walk maps out which planning layouts are hottest, coolest, most pleasant, and most unpleasant. One of the determining factors is the perceived temperature. Is a location situated in direct sunlight or is it shaded? In addition to air temperature and perceived temperature, the thermal walk considers thermal perception, i.e., how is a particular location perceived in terms of heat? The psychological effect is another important factor in heat-proof spatial planning."

What this means in practice is that a researcher team uses both sensors and participants' experience to determine how heat is experienced in different areas. These results can be used to determine the performance of urban green infrastructure in terms of reducing the urban heat island effect. For the sensor part, two devices are used that register temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, and importantly, the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature. The device in question we apply is the Kestrel 5400 heat stress tracker

https://kestrelinstruments.com/media/magic360/cache/b323c452333484213aa1554d1dedd3b6/0/8/0854-orange-01.jpg 

For participants a questionnaire is held at each location to be tested. Questions relate to topics such as clothing worn, experienced comfort level, and desired changes in environment. At the same time, the sensors calibrate to each environment which takes some 10-15 minutes. If locations are within 2 km, up to 5 locations can be tested in an hour, making thermal walks a practically effective method for measuring the performance of urban green infrastructure. For warm days, the practice is now well established. It is of course crucial to ensure participants are not exposed to extreme heat so temperatures up to 25 degrees are preferred. What would be interesting is how effective this method is during colder days, and what would be an acceptable minimum temperature for thermal walks during winter. Our current students are testing thermal walks for heat in Hengelo, and we hope to test winter conditions as well. 

Friday, May 2, 2025

Initial results blue green roofs and solar panel performance

The initial results for our performance testing are in and so far it is looking both good, and a bit inconclusive. As reported we started measuring at the end of March. The first parameter I am looking at is air temperature, for solar panels placed on a normal roof (first) and on a blue-green roof (second, photo taken when still under construction).

 

The hypothesis is that a blue-green roof with solar panels is cooler during sunshine than a roof with only solar panels. Keep in mind that solar panels operate at best performance at 25◦C. Especially during summer, the cooler temperature will lead to higher performance for the solar panels with blue-green roofs due to evapotranspiration from the vegetation. This is the theory, so let's see what happens in practice.

On the 17th of April at 15:00 we get these example results:


Sensor 1 is above solar panels with blue-green roof, 2 below. 5 above solar panels, 6 below. Expected temperatures from high to low: 5 > 1  and 6 > 2 

If we expand the time series for more inputs we consistently see 6, below the regular solar panels, having the highest extreme temperatures. It is closest to the black flat roof and there might be less wind under the solar panels, thus increasing the heat during the day.

 

 


Examining this more closely for a single day, we see the following:


From this we can conclude that the location below the solar panels (6) is consistently the most extreme hot and cold; Next most extreme is 2 (below solar panels with blue-green roofs. The largest difference between these locations so far has been 5.8 degrees during sun hours and 3.5 degrees during nighttime hours.

Above solar panels with blue-green roofs (1) and above solar panels (5) are difficult to distinguish on a day-to-day basis. The exact impacts should become clearer over time.


Heat symposium July - report

The heat symposium in Amsterdam in July showcased current research and solutions to combat urban heat stress. We have many policies and inf...