Friday, February 20, 2026

GI example - trees and the question: Which tree has the most benefits? part 2

In a previous post we saw the various aspects of trees to take into account to see what category it is. Now that we have some idea of the different types of trees, let's dive deeper into how benefits are calculated. A major player in the Netherlands is i-Tree who published a guide on calculating tree benefits with a great visual example of the extent that larger trees are performing compared to smaller trees. One example shows a chestnut with the circumference of 169 smaller trees combined.

 

Once you know the tree specifics, you can calculate benefits. These include air pollution removal, CO2 sequestration, food provisioning, oxygen production, stream flow and water quality improvement, volatile organic compounds removal, mitigating UV radiation, and providing wildlife habitat. Other benefits are still in development since the calculations are more complex, such as human health benefits. Details are described in the guide here. 

How this is converted to financial gains is a bit of a mystery, mostly because prices vary from year to year, and sometimes policymakers prefer to rely on actual benefits rather than prevented costs. You can test this on a small scale, once for free, with this software. The WUR also has a guide that you can fill out yourself, depending on the species of tree. Note that this guide is not dependent on a tree's benefits! So it is still difficult to look at an individual tree and go, that's x euro of ecosystem services. Luckily there has been a study testing individual trees and the i-Tree method. This shows a big difference in annual tree benefits in US dollars depending on size (small trees - height less than 7 m with crown diameter < 5 m; medium trees - height 8–15 m, crown diameter 6–10 m; large trees - height over 15 m and crown diameter > 10 m.)

 

The first two trees below would provide services that are about 3-4 dollars worth every year, and the next two are about medium sized for canopy and could be 14-19 dollars. It seems a low amount given the costs to grow and place a tree, and the wide amount of services they provide and issues they help prevent. Or, much like water and sunlight, we might not value these services that we get for 'free' as much as they should be.






 

Friday, February 6, 2026

Policy trends in river and flood management in the Netherlands since the 2010s - part 3

This part connects the most relevant water management policies in terms of quantity to the implementing organizations, from the European to the most local municipal context.

 

Policies per governmental organization

 

The table below provides an overview of the main laws, policies, and guidelines relevant to water management in the Netherlands, and explains what main responsibilities and topic areas it concerns, including the timeline it is applicable to. Several items have been given the name ‘delta’, and there differences are explained here. The main coordinator of all delta laws and policies is the Delta Commissioner, who enables cooperation between all stakeholders on all different levels. The Main Delta Program monitors the progress of delta decisions, preferred strategies, and delta plans. There are currently delta decisions on water safety, fresh water, spatial adaptation, the Rhine-Meuse delta, and the Ijssel lake. Preferred strategies provide bespoke guidance for various areas. Delta plans contain concrete measures on how to implement these policies[i].

 

Table: Main Dutch water management laws and policies since 2010

Policy Name

Years active

Key Features

European Water Framework Directive[ii]

2003, amended in 2008 - 2015

A framework to protect all water bodies (river basins and groundwater) up to one nautical mile from shore in EU countries.

European Floods Directive[iii]

 

2007-current

Legislation for all EU countries to prepare risk assessments and flood risk management plans by 2015.

Environment and Planning Act (Omgevingswet)[iv]

2024-current

Sets out the duties of the various government authorities with

regard to water management.

National Water Program[v]

2022-2027

Contains river basin management plans, flood risk management plans, and the North Sea Programme. 

National Climate Adaptation Strategy[vi]

2016, next version 2026

Together with the National Adaptation Plan, this sets the course for climate-proofing the Netherlands.

Delta Decision Spatial Adaptation[vii]

2014, updated in 2021

National goals for a climate-proof and water-robust Netherlands in 2050.

Delta Plan Spatial Adaptation (DPRA)[viii]

2017-2050

Guide for municipalities, waterboards, provinces, and the national government to speed up the process of spatial adaptation in 45 regions.

Room for the River 2.0[ix]

2025-2050

Enabling a future proof river area (from floods).

Room for the River[x]

2006-2019

Measures to create more space and prevent flooding in the tributaries of the Rhine and Meuse rivers.

Flood protection program (Hoogwaterbeschermingsprogramma HWBP)[xi]

2014-2050

Main implementation program of the National Deltaprogram by the 21 water boards and Rijkswaterstaat.

Example Water management program waterboard Vechtstromen[xii]

2022-2027

Local future water management programs that align with the national water plan, river basin management plans, and provincial environmental visions.

Climate risks in the Netherlands[xiii]

2024-2050

Analysis from the Planning agency for the living environment of the current climate risks in the Netherlands, to help enable policies for a climate-proof and water-robust Netherlands in 2050.

Guide Safe Climate Adaptation[xiv]

2024

Guide from the Dutch Institute for Public Safety for all safety regions

Example Risk profile safety region Amsterdam-Amstelland[xv]

2025-2028

Local risk profile and suggested measures for the safety region Amsterdam-Amstelland.

Example Water and Climate Adaptation Plan municipality Enschede[xvi]

2022-2026

This describes how the municipality deals with wastewater, rainwater, and groundwater, and what is being done to prepare for the consequences of climate change.

 

Additional types of water management guidelines, programs, and rules exist and influence each other, as shown in the figure below, based on the water board Vechtstromen[xvii]:

 

A diagram of water management

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

 

Figure 2: Relationships between policies on different governmental levels when creating water management plans by Dutch water boards[xviii].



[i] https://www.deltaprogramma.nl/deltaprogramma/wat-is-het-deltaprogramma

[ii] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/water/water-framework-directive_en

[iii] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32007L0060

[iv] https://www.government.nl/topics/environment-and-planning-act

[v] https://iplo.nl/thema/water/beleid-regelgeving-water/programma-omgevingswet-water/nationaal-water-programma-2022-2027/

[vi] https://klimaatadaptatienederland.nl/en/policy-programmes/national-strategy/nas/

[vii] https://www.deltaprogramma.nl/themas/ruimtelijke-adaptatie

[viii] https://www.deltaprogramma.nl/themas/ruimtelijke-adaptatie/deltaplan

[ix] https://www.ruimtevoorderivier.nl/documenten/beleidsnotas/2025/04/08/programma-integraal-riviermanagement-april-2025

[x] https://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/water/waterbeheer/bescherming-tegen-het-water/maatregelen-om-overstromingen-te-voorkomen/ruimte-voor-de-rivieren#ruimte-voor-de-rivier

[xi] https://www.hwbp.nl/over-hwbp/wie-we-zijn-en-wat-we-doen

[xiii] https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2024/05/14/bijlage-2-rapport-pbl-2024-klimaatrisicos-in-nederland

[xiv] https://nipv.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/20240930-NIPV-Handreiking-veilige-klimaatadaptatie.pdf

[xvi] https://groenblauwenschede.ireporting.nl/FbContent.ashx/pub_1001/downloads/v210622195815/Water-%20en_klimaatadaptatieplan%20Gemeente%20Enschede%202022-2026.pdf

[xvii] https://vechtstromen.bestuurlijkeinformatie.nl/Agenda/Document/dd2aaa8a-eae3-4a00-bc99-7542955a6eff?documentId=0967098f-e41a-4982-a0df-e670d3cb77d1&agendaItemId=4dacd9de-ff3d-408f-93a8-555db1076c89

[xviii] https://vechtstromen.bestuurlijkeinformatie.nl/Agenda/Document/dd2aaa8a-eae3-4a00-bc99-7542955a6eff?documentId=0967098f-e41a-4982-a0df-e670d3cb77d1&agendaItemId=4dacd9de-ff3d-408f-93a8-555db1076c89

GI example - trees and the question: Which tree has the most benefits? part 2

In a previous post we saw the various aspects of trees to take into account to see what category it is. Now that we have some idea of the di...